February 21, 2006

Mea culpa from ‘Haaretz’?

Posted in Uncategorized at 1:07 pm by yisraelmedad

Sunday, December 29, 2002
By ELI POLLAK AND YISRAEL MEDAD The Jerusalem PostPerhaps the most influential Hebrew newspaper is Ha’aretz. It thinks of
itself as the Israeli equivalent to the New York Times or the Swiss Neue
Zuericher Zeitung. It sells itself as the “newspaper for thinking people.”

More than once, its headlines have directly influenced government
activities. Only recently, Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu had to
retract UN Ambassador Yehuda Lankry’s declaration to the United Nations that
Israel recognizes the need for a two-state solution in the Middle East.

But during the past year, Ha’aretz’s image was tarnished. A study by Ran
Farhi, Tomer Tidhar and Eli Pollak of Israel’s Media Watch, on the coverage
of populations afflicted by the “terror war” in Ha’aretz’s weekly supplement
during October 2000 through December 2001, uncovered a severe professional
failing of the magazine’s reporters and editors. The coverage of events in
the Ha’aretz supplement was biased. The supplement ignored the difficulties
of the Jewish settlers in Judea, Samaria and Gaza and gave exhaustive
treatment to the troubles of the Palestinian population (92 percent of the
articles deal with the Palestinian population, most of them written by
Gideon Levy).

During the 15-month period covered by the study, only five articles were
published on the terror and war victims on the Israeli side. Considerable
attention was given to the issue of refusal to serve in the army (three
articles) and to the Left side of the political spectrum (six articles), but
no coverage of the right-wing perspective.

Levy’s articles, taken separately, did not meet certain basic professional
requirements. In many instances the right of response was denied from those
accused of perpetrating “acts of violence” against Palestinians. A thorough
attempt at verifying the facts was not undertaken. Levy did not follow up on
his cases. His articles were “single-track,” employing horror pictures that
were often unrelated to the topic itself, confusing news and opinions.
Jewish settlers and IDF soldiers were presented anonymously, use of biased
terms was abundant, including associations with Nazis, and the killing of
Jewish settlers was legitimized.

The study, which received broad coverage in the wake of author Irit Linur’s
scathing critique of Ha’aretz, led to a significant number of cancellations
of Ha’aretz subscriptions. The newspaper had to defend itself publicly, and
even broadcast a radio advertisement telling us that “Ha’aretz is not really
what you thought it is.”

Tomer Tidhar and Eli Pollak of Israel’s Media Watch undertook a second study
of Ha’aretz, for an additional period of eight months, January to August
this year. Four months were during the period preceding the publication of
the first report, the second four months were post publication.

The new study reveals that Ha’aretz took to heart some of the criticism
leveled at it. The first four months were a repeat of the previous 15
months, including parallels between the IDF and the Nazis. On May 4, Gideon
Levy wrote “Now the village has turned into a real jail. Habla, Azun, Jit
and Punduk, roadside villages, are closed with the new iron gates. The keys
are in the hands of the jailer, the IDF. Is the distance between these iron
gates and the gates of the concentration camps so large that no one wants to
draw the parallel?”

The second four months were different. All of Levy’s articles included a
response from the IDF.

His style became somewhat less tendentious. Harsh terms aimed against the
IDF and the settlers were limited. All the pictures that appeared with his
articles were relevant, although there was an abundance of cynical pictures
of children.

Instead of presenting his own views, he lets others talk. For example, on
May 31 he reports a story by Abed al Ahmar, who upon entering the Israeli
detention camp “Ofer” was told by the officer in charge: “Welcome to our
concentration camp. What the Germans did to us, we will do to you.” Levy
then brings the IDF’s vehement denial of the story.

There was a greater balance between Left and Right. Three articles described
life in the West Bank and Gaza. In some cases, there was clear empathy with
the Jewish residents. For example, on June 14, Sarah Lebovitz-Dar reported
on the visit of actor Haim Topol to the isolated village of Netzarim in the
Gaza strip. Topol came to identify with the residents and donate a monument
in memory of slain minister Rehavam Ze’evi. A picture showed Topol with the
children of Netzarim.

Four articles dealt with cultural aspects of the right-wing camp. These
included an article on Michael Karsh, publisher of the weekly Makor Rishon,
a piece about a Jerusalem club “The song of the land” whose theme is the
Right wing’s sharp criticism of events in Israel and even a review of a book
God’s Soldier by Micki Sheinfeld – which describes a yeshiva student who
serves in the IDF’s crack Golani brigade.

This doesn’t imply that the magazine ceased dealing with left-wing
interests. For example, on June 28, in an article entitled “Searching for
B’tselem,” Aviva Lurie presented a review of the history of the group, which
has consistently championed Palestinian rights. But the article also
includes critical questions regarding the veracity of the group’s reports,
bringing to light conflicting opinions in a balanced way.

The moral of the story is that public media criticism sometimes works. The
publishers of Ha’aretz demonstrated a rare sensitivity to the public. Is it
too much to ask of other media organs in Israel to show similar trends?

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: